THE SHORT VERSION
- A Few Good Men opened on Thursday at Broadway's Vivian Beaumont Theater in a Lincoln Center Theater revival directed by Michael Arden, with Bradley Whitford as Col. Nathan Jessep and Tom Blyth as Lt. Daniel Kaffee.《A Few Good Men》周四在百老汇 Vivian Beaumont 剧院开演，由 Michael Arden 执导，Bradley Whitford 饰 Nathan Jessep 上校，Tom Blyth 饰 Daniel Kaffee 中尉。
- Deadline's Greg Evans calls the staging handsome and Whitford a worthy villain, but says the play's power to shock feels drained; TheWrap calls the revival a creaky old play and Blyth's cross-examination weak.Deadline 的 Greg Evans 认为调度漂亮、Whitford 是称职的反派，但说这部戏的冲击力已被抽干；TheWrap 称复排“老朽”，并认为 Blyth 的反击软弱。
- Both reviews credit Dane Laffrey's large set and measure the production against the 1992 film; neither reports a closing date or box-office figures.两篇评论都提到 Dane Laffrey 的大型布景，并以1992年电影作为参照；两篇都没有提到演出结束日期或票房数字。
The revival opened Thursday at the Vivian Beaumont复排周四在 Vivian Beaumont 剧院开演
Lincoln Center Theater’s revival of A Few Good Men opened on Thursday at the Vivian Beaumont Theater, the Broadway house inside Lincoln Center where the company stages its work. TheWrap records the venue and the night, and notes that the theater’s current management has been pairing familiar screen titles with stage revivals, starting with Ragtime last season and continuing with The Sound of Music later. Deadline credits Aaron Sorkin as the writer and Michael Arden as director, and lists a running time of 2 hr 35 min including an intermission.林肯中心剧院的《A Few Good Men》复排于周四在 Vivian Beaumont 剧院开演，这是林肯中心内的百老汇剧场，也是该剧院公司演出自己的制作的地方。TheWrap 记录了场地与开演之夜，并提到剧院目前的管理层一直在把熟悉的银幕作品改成舞台复排：上一季是《Ragtime》，之后还有《The Sound of Music》。Deadline 列出的主创为编剧 Aaron Sorkin、导演 Michael Arden，并注明演出时长2小时35分钟（含中场休息）。
Deadline prints the full cast: Tom Blyth, Bradley Whitford, Krysta Rodriguez, Stephanie Berry, Nick Blaemire, Michael Braugher, Christopher Gurr, Billy Eugene Jones, Collin Kelly-Sordelet, Shunté Lofton, Michael Oberholtzer, Lavel Schley, Thom Sesma, Daniel Velez and John Zdrojeski. TheWrap assigns the principals: Whitford as Lt. Col. Nathan R. Jessep, Blyth as Lt. j.g. Daniel Kaffee, Rodriguez as Lt. Cmdr. JoAnne Galloway and Daniel Velez as PFC William T. Santiago, the Marine whose death sets the case in motion.Deadline 刊出完整演员表：Tom Blyth、Bradley Whitford、Krysta Rodriguez、Stephanie Berry、Nick Blaemire、Michael Braugher、Christopher Gurr、Billy Eugene Jones、Collin Kelly-Sordelet、Shunté Lofton、Michael Oberholtzer、Lavel Schley、Thom Sesma、Daniel Velez 与 John Zdrojeski。TheWrap 给出主要角色的分配：Whitford 饰 Nathan R. Jessep 中校，Blyth 饰 Daniel Kaffee 海军中尉，Rodriguez 饰 JoAnne Galloway 海军中校，Daniel Velez 饰 PFC William T. Santiago——这名海军陆战队员的死亡启动了整起案件。
“You can’t handle the truth” as a test of the staging“You can't handle the truth”成为检验这版制作的标尺
Both reviews treat the play’s best-known line as a test of the production. Deadline says that when “You can’t handle the truth!” arrives it feels “both very, very familiar and ever so slightly tossed off, maybe even rushed, as if this Broadway revival of Aaron Sorkin’s A Few Good Men doesn’t want cheap applause or an audience even momentarily distracted by cinematic nostalgia.” It notes that the line is printed on T-shirts sold at the Lincoln Center merchandise table.两篇评论都把这部戏最有名的那句台词当作检验这版制作的标尺。Deadline 说，当“You can't handle the truth!”出现时，它显得“极其熟悉，又像是被轻轻带过，甚至有些仓促，仿佛这版复排既不想讨要廉价的掌声，也不愿观众哪怕有一刻被电影式的怀旧分神”。该评论还注意到，这句话被印在林肯中心周边商品摊出售的T恤上。
Deadline adds that Blyth’s Kaffee demands the truth in a more conversational tone than Tom Cruise’s “sputtering delivery” in the 1992 film, and that Whitford’s punchline is “as forceful as it needs to be.” Its summary of the exchange is qualified: “All in all, the famous exchange is less histrionic than we might remember,” followed by “Anti-climactic? A bit maybe.” TheWrap does not analyse the line; it argues instead that Blyth’s cross-examination of Whitford is weaker than Cruise’s confrontation with Jack Nicholson.Deadline 补充说，Blyth 的 Kaffee 索要真相时的语气比1992年电影里 Tom Cruise 的“结巴式演绎”更接近日常对话，而 Whitford 说出那句重 punchline 时“力道刚好够”。它给这段戏的总结留有余地：“总的来说，这段著名交锋没有我们记忆中那么戏剧化”，随后又说：“有点反高潮？也许有一点。”TheWrap 没有分析这句台词，而是认为 Blyth 对 Whitford 的质询不如 Cruise 对 Jack Nicholson 的那场对峙。
Deadline: handsome staging, drained shockDeadline：调度漂亮，冲击力已被抽干
Greg Evans, writing for Deadline, calls Arden’s staging “handsome” and says the revival “almost feels vital,” because its subject — a commander who shifts blame for a negligent death onto two Marines who followed orders — reads as more relevant now than in 1989. He also argues that the play’s “power to shock feels drained,” since the bullying commander at its centre says nothing audiences do not already hear on the news, which leaves the courtroom drama “without much drama.”Deadline 的 Greg Evans 称 Arden 的调度“漂亮”，并说这版复排“几乎还算有现实意义”，因为它的题材——一名指挥官把一次疏忽致死的责任推给两名服从命令的海军陆战队员——在今天读来比1989年更贴切。他也认为这部戏“震撼之力已被抽干”：处于中心的那个霸凌型指挥官所说的，观众每天都能在新闻里听到，于是这场法庭戏“没剩下多少戏”。
The review faults the production for declining to revise the text. It holds up Sorkin’s adaptation of To Kill a Mockingbird, which it calls “remarkable,” and argues that revivals work best when they force an audience to rethink long-held assumptions. It suggests the play would be more compelling if Sorkin had given Galloway enough material to be more than “a Jiminy Cricket” pushing Kaffee toward heroism, and says the revival offers no new angle on its villain.该评论批评这版制作没有修改文本。它举出 Sorkin 改编的《To Kill a Mockingbird》，称其“出色”，并认为复排最好能让观众重新审视既有的判断。它提出，如果 Sorkin 给 Galloway 足够的材料，让她不只是把 Kaffee 推向英雄主义的“良心蟋蟀”，这部戏会更有说服力；它同时认为这版对反派的处理没有提供新角度。
TheWrap: a creaky old play with an easy solutionTheWrap：一部老朽的戏，结局来得太容易
TheWrap reaches a blunter conclusion. It recalls that the 1989 Broadway production took a single Tony nomination, for lead actor Tom Hulce, and lost the Best Play race to Lettice & Lovage, then says the revival “makes it clear that the Tony Awards got it right.” Its judgment follows in five words: A Few Good Men is “a creaky old play.”TheWrap 的结论更直接。它回顾1989年的百老汇首演只拿到一项托尼奖提名（最佳男主角 Tom Hulce），并在最佳话剧奖上输给《Lettice & Lovage》，然后说这版复排“清楚地说明托尼奖当年的判断是对的”。它的评语只有五个词：《A Few Good Men》是一部“摇摇欲坠的老戏”。
The central complaint is that the case resolves too easily. TheWrap writes that the two defence lawyers “don’t make their case; it is handed to them when a subordinate (Thom Sesma) snitches on Jessep, then conveniently commits suicide,” and that Jessep’s collapse on the witness stand is “equally easy-peasy.” It also says the play “begins much like a rom-com,” with a contrived fight between two lawyers who could not be more different.核心的批评是案件解决得太容易。TheWrap 写道，这两位辩护律师“并没有打赢案子；案子是别人送上门的——一名下属（Thom Sesma）告发了 Jessep，然后很顺便地自杀了”，而 Jessep 在证人席上的崩溃“同样轻而易举”。它还提到，这部戏“开场很像一部爱情喜剧”，两个截然不同的人先来了一场刻意制造的争吵。
Whitford divides praise from BlythWhitford 获得一致肯定，Blyth 评价分歧
The reviews agree on Whitford. Deadline says he “subverts” the amiability audiences know from The West Wing’s Josh Lyman, turning “zealous and mean,” and calls his Jessep “a worthy villain” and “a depressingly recognizable monster.” TheWrap describes the same character as “a God-fearing fascist,” and treats his confrontation with Kaffee as the evening’s real contest.两篇评论在 Whitford 身上意见一致。Deadline 说他把观众从《The West Wing》里 Josh Lyman 身上熟悉的亲和感“反过来用”，变得“狂热而刻薄”，并称他的 Jessep 是“称职的反派”“一个令人沮丧地眼熟的怪物”。TheWrap 把同一个角色形容为“一个敬畏上帝的法西斯主义者”，并把这角色与 Kaffee 的对峙视为当晚唯一真正的较量。
They diverge on Blyth. Deadline says the actor “puts his boyishness to good use” and makes Kaffee’s turn from “frat-boy arrogance to righteous justice-seeker” a credible payoff, calling the result “Atticus Finch-in-dress-whites.” TheWrap calls his takedown of Whitford “weak.” On Rodriguez, Deadline says her Galloway is “committed” but may seem “ancillary” because the writing gives her little to carry; TheWrap calls her “the epitome of earnest dedication to the rule of law.”分歧出现在 Blyth 身上。Deadline 说这位演员“把身上的少年感用对了地方”，让 Kaffee 从“兄弟会式的自负”转向“追求正义的人”这一步成为可信的收束，并称结果像“穿着白军装的 Atticus Finch”。TheWrap 则说他扳倒 Whitford 的那一场“软弱”。关于 Rodriguez，Deadline 说她的 Galloway 演得“投入”，却可能显得“边缘”，因为剧本给她的东西不多；TheWrap 称她是“对法治赤诚投入的化身”。
The set, the director’s background and what neither review reports布景、导演的出身，以及两篇评论都没写的事
Both reviews single out Dane Laffrey’s set. Deadline describes an airy design that uses the large Lincoln Center stage to make the courtroom “merely one portion of the metaphoric stakes,” with a lonely army cot that doubles as an autopsy table, a locker-room area and an observation tower looming overhead. TheWrap agrees the set is mammoth but says it “only highlights the play’s weaknesses,” and argues that the production “unspools on the vast Vivian Beaumont stage as if it were really a screenplay.”两篇评论都单独提到 Dane Laffrey 的布景。Deadline 形容这是一套通透的设计，利用林肯中心的大舞台让法庭“只是隐喻性赌注的一部分”，台上有一张孤独的行军床兼作尸检台、一块更衣区，头顶还悬着一座观察塔。TheWrap 同样认为布景庞大，但说它“只是让这部戏的弱点更明显”，并认为整部制作“在宽阔的 Vivian Beaumont 舞台上展开，像是真的在演一个电影剧本”。
TheWrap notes that Arden usually directs musicals, credits him with Tony Awards for Parade and Maybe Happy Ending, and says that here he has “substituted singing with lots of yelling from his actors.” Neither review reports a closing date for the run, ticket sales or a casting change, and neither describes an announcement beyond the opening itself. Related coverage on this site includes the theatrical release of Social Reckoning, the New York run of Only Living Pickpocket and the BFI London Film Festival 2026 winners.TheWrap 还提到，Arden 通常执导音乐剧，曾凭《Parade》与《Maybe Happy Ending》获得托尼奖，而在这里他“用演员的大量喊叫取代了歌唱”。两篇评论都没有提到演出结束日期、票房数字或演员变动，也没有写到开演之外的任何公告。本站相关阅读包括《Social Reckoning》院线上映、《Only Living Pickpocket》纽约放映与2026年 BFI 伦敦电影节获奖名单。
Sources & reporting limits来源与核查范围
Follow Film to find related stories on your next visit.关注电影，下次访问时阅读相关文章。
