THE SHORT VERSION
- Taika Waititi posted the Klara and the Sun poster on Instagram on Saturday and pointed at the gap between its 78 percent audience score and its critics score, The Hollywood Reporter reports.据《The Hollywood Reporter》报道,Taika Waititi 周六在 Instagram 上贴出《Klara and the Sun》的海报,并指出 Rotten Tomatoes 上78%的观众评分与影评人评分之间的落差。
- Both papers quote his caption calling reviewers sad lost souls who became critics because they could not become artists, and closing with irrelevant, out of touch, obsolete, in the bin.两家媒体都引用了他的配文:他称那些人是“可悲的失落灵魂”,因为当不成艺术家才成了影评人;结尾是“无关、脱节、过时、丢进垃圾桶”。
- The two reports differ on the critics score, 26 percent in Deadline and 28 percent in The Hollywood Reporter, and on the opening weekend, $701,000 against an estimated $725,000.两篇报道在影评人评分上不一致,Deadline 写26%,《The Hollywood Reporter》写28%;开画票房也不一致,分别为70.1万美元与约72.5万美元。
A poster, two scores and a Saturday post一张海报、两个分数与一次周六发帖
Taika Waititi spent part of Saturday on Instagram arguing with his reviews. The Hollywood Reporter reports that the director shared the poster for Klara and the Sun and pointed at the gap between its audience and critics scores on Rotten Tomatoes: 78 percent against 28 percent. Deadline puts the critics figure at 26 percent and dates the post to Saturday too; it also places the opening at last weekend.Taika Waititi 在周六花了一部分时间在 Instagram 上跟自己的影评较劲。据《The Hollywood Reporter》报道,这位导演贴出了《Klara and the Sun》的海报,并指出 Rotten Tomatoes 上观众评分与影评人评分之间的落差:78% 对 28%。Deadline 给出的影评人数字是26%,同样把这则帖子的时间定在周六。Deadline 把影片的开画时间定在上个周末。
Deadline frames the post less diplomatically, as choice words for critics, and notes that the director is an Oscar winner. It also says he used the post to boast about the audience number. Both papers agree on the mechanics: a poster, two scores side by side, and a caption written for the people who had already bought tickets. Deadline’s own headline uses two of the director’s words.Deadline 的措辞没那么客气:它说这是这位奥斯卡得主对影评人的“狠话”,并称他用这则帖子炫耀观众评分,强调观众给出的高分。两家在事实层面一致:一张海报、两个并排的分数,以及一段写给已经买票的人看的配文。该刊的标题直接用了这位导演的两个词。
The caption, in full那段配文的全文
The caption is the part both papers quote at length. “I haven’t read a review of anything aimed at me or my peers in almost 15 years,” Waititi wrote, according to The Hollywood Reporter. “But I do listen to the people.” Deadline prints the same two sentences and describes them as his preface to what followed.两家媒体都大段引用了这段配文。据《The Hollywood Reporter》报道,Waititi 写道:“我已经将近15年没有读过任何针对我或我同辈的评论了。但我会听观众的声音。”Deadline 印出的是同样两句话,并把它称作后面那段话的引子。
What followed was the part that travelled. “So this Halloween, let’s spare a thought for those sad lost souls who couldn’t achieve their dreams of becoming artists, and thus became critics. The same people who also hated Jojo Rabbit,” he wrote, before closing with four verdicts: “Irrelevant. Out of touch. Obsolete. In the bin.” The two papers divide the passage differently: Deadline breaks it at the Jojo Rabbit reference and resumes with a fresh attribution, while The Hollywood Reporter runs the whole thing as one caption.真正传开的是后面那一段。他写道:“所以这个万圣节,让我们为那些可悲的失落灵魂留一点念头——他们没能实现成为艺术家的梦想,于是成了影评人。也是同样这批人,当年讨厌《Jojo Rabbit》。”随后他给出四个判断:“无关。脱节。过时。丢进垃圾桶。”两家对这段话的切分方式不同:Deadline 在《Jojo Rabbit》处断开、再补一次归属说明,《The Hollywood Reporter》则把整段放进同一句配文里。
Where the two accounts disagree两家报道的分歧所在
The audience figure in the post was the one on the poster. The Hollywood Reporter says the image showed a 78 percent audience score next to a 28 percent critics score. Deadline reports the same 78 percent and adds that it has since slipped, putting it at 73 percent at the time of writing, against a critics rating it gives as 26 percent. Neither paper says which view of the Rotten Tomatoes page the poster reproduced. Deadline’s figure comes with a timestamp; The Hollywood Reporter’s does not.帖子里引用的观众分数就是海报上的那个。《The Hollywood Reporter》称,海报上是78%的观众评分,旁边是28%的影评人评分。Deadline 记录的观众评分同样是78%,但补充说这个数字后来下滑到73%(截至该文发稿),而它给出的影评人评分是26%。两家都没有说明海报复制的是 Rotten Tomatoes 的哪个页面。Deadline 的数字带上了时间点,《The Hollywood Reporter》的没有。
That two-point gap is one of two small disagreements in the coverage, and neither paper explains it. Neither says when the scores were captured, how many reviews each figure rests on, or whether the post was still up when the stories were filed. Rotten Tomatoes is named by both; neither links to the page it is quoting. Two points do not change what the caption was complaining about, but they do change the record of it, and neither paper builds anything more on it.这两个百分点的差距是两篇报道中第一处小分歧,两家都没有解释原因。没有人说明分数是何时抓取的、各自基于多少篇评论,也没有人说明发稿时那则帖子是否还在。两家都提到 Rotten Tomatoes,但都没有链接到它所引用的页面。两个百分点改变不了这则配文在抱怨什么,却会改变关于它的记录。
A weak opening, counted two ways一次疲软的开画,两种计数
The Hollywood Reporter has the fuller commercial picture. It reports that the film opened in 880 North American theatres, earned an estimated $725,000 in its opening weekend, finished outside the top 10, and had taken about $1.7 million worldwide as of publication. The paper labels the weekend figure an estimate rather than a studio number, and it does not give a budget.《The Hollywood Reporter》给出的商业图景更完整。它报道,影片在880家北美影院开画,首周末估算票房72.5万美元,排在当周前十之外;截至发稿,全球票房约170万美元。该报把周末数字标为估算值,而不是制片厂公布的正式数字,并且没有给出制作预算。
Deadline gives a different opening figure, $701,000 domestic, and adds two things the other report leaves out: a reported budget of $20 million and a distribution decision. It reports that Sony cut the film’s wide release to 880 theatres in the US after the negative reviews out of BFI this month. The Hollywood Reporter mentions the 880 theatres without tying that number to the reviews, and neither paper says how many theatres the film played before any cut.Deadline 给出的开画数字不同:北美70.1万美元,并补上了另一篇报道没有提到的两件事——据称2000万美元的制作预算,以及一个发行决定。它报道说,在本月 BFI 的负面评价之后,Sony 把影片的广泛上映规模削减到全美880家影院。《The Hollywood Reporter》也提到880家影院,但没有把这个数字与那些评价联系起来;两家都没有说削减之前影片在多少家影院上映。
The review Deadline was reporting onDeadline 自己那篇影评
Deadline’s own notice is part of the record it is reporting on. Damon White wrote that Waititi should be a snug fit for Ishiguro’s novel given the director’s taste for a particular kind of cringe comedy, then concluded that “Klara just doesn’t deliver on any of the fronts it promises.” The paper prints that verdict above its box-office paragraph; the notice is one of the reviews the post was answering. It is the only review either story quotes.Deadline 自己的影评也是它所报道的事实的一部分。Damon White 写道,以这位导演对某种“现实感尴尬喜剧”的偏好,他本该与 Ishiguro 的小说严丝合缝;但他随后给出的结论是:“Klara 并没有在它承诺的任何一条线上兑现。”该刊把这段判断放在票房段落之前,而那篇影评正是这则帖子在回应的评论之一。
Neither paper quotes a critic responding to the post, and neither reports a reply from Sony Pictures. What the coverage records is a sequence: reviews out of BFI, a wide release cut to 880 theatres, an opening outside the top 10, and a director answering on Instagram on a Saturday afternoon. No one in either story speaks for the critics as a group.两篇报道都没有引用任何影评人对这则帖子的回应,也没有提到 Sony Pictures 的答复。报道记录下来的是一条顺序:BFI 的负面评价、广泛上映被削减到880家影院、开画排在十名之外,以及一位导演在周六下午用 Instagram 回应。两篇报道中都没有人代表影评人群体发言。
The film behind the argument争论背后的那部电影
Klara and the Sun adapts Kazuo Ishiguro’s 2021 novel. The Hollywood Reporter describes it as a dystopian story about an obsolete companion android who tries to bond with her new owner, Josie, a girl dealing with an illness, with Jenna Ortega and Amy Adams starring. Deadline describes the same android as an artificial friend bought for a gravely ill teenager, gives Josie’s performer as Mia Tharia, and says the family is mourning the death of her older sister Sal. The sister’s name comes from Deadline; the other report does not give it.《Klara and the Sun》改编自 Kazuo Ishiguro 2021年的小说。《The Hollywood Reporter》把它描述为一个反乌托邦故事:一个被淘汰的陪伴型机器人试图与她的小主人 Josie 建立联系,而这个女孩正在生病;影片由 Jenna Ortega 与 Amy Adams 主演。Deadline 把同一个机器人描述成为一名重病少女买下的“人工朋友”,并写明 Josie 由 Mia Tharia 饰演,这家人正在为她的姐姐 Sal 的去世而哀悼。姐姐的名字只出现在 Deadline 的版本里。
At the New York premiere earlier this month the director was already talking about artificial intelligence, which the film’s premise turns on. The Hollywood Reporter quotes him saying that AI is probably inevitable in the industry but should be used by humans as a tool, as opposed to a replacement. Neither paper says whether Sony or any critic has answered the post. Related coverage on this site includes the BFI London Film Festival 2026 winners, the Asia Pacific Screen Awards and the first reviews of The Mosquito Bowl.本月早些时候的纽约首映上,这位导演已经谈过人工智能——影片的前提正建立在这上面。《The Hollywood Reporter》引述他的话说,AI 进入这个行业大概是不可避免的,但只要它被人类当作工具使用,而不是替代品。两篇报道都没有说明 Sony 或任何影评人是否回应了这则帖子。本站相关阅读包括2026年 BFI 伦敦电影节获奖名单、亚太电影大奖与《The Mosquito Bowl》的首批影评。
Sources & reporting limits来源与核查范围
Follow Film to find related stories on your next visit.关注电影,下次访问时阅读相关文章。



